Inform President Medvedev that I am very proud of the progress he has made. Also I am very proud of the BRIC alliances. This is the beginning of a positive powerful economical, and political force that will change, and enhance, and help the future of their countries and others around the globe. It is essential and very important that this alliance will last a very long time. Other countries of the world will look up to this positive, and helpful, and productive force. Remember, to improve the livelihood of the people, your country members, and dont be afraid to have others to join your alliance. But make sure that they are screened properly, and thouroughly, without any prejeduce, and never underestimate the the force of opposition that may try to hinder your progress!
Let the west live with thier ignorant policies,this is the 21st century ,countries have educated themselves ,and surpassed western ideaology and its way of life.these countries China ,india ,brazil ,russia ,have a philosophy far superior to the west,it is time these devoloped countries which have ambitions of unity,instead of divisions amongst it own kind..Countries with a philosophy of materialism as it object of living ,eventually end up in chaos and instability.
BRIC is what he meant as Johnx points out, however, spinfusor is right, he got Brazil and China out of order. Unless of course he is calculating China some other way. Which could be ominous! Unless there is some sea territory involved. I put it down to a geniune mistake, but hey he might start following the trend of doing stand up comedy as a world leader :-)
This should be a foward looking organisation, to allow economic development across the board for all nations, to have a forum on equal terms, as an alternative to the G7 controllers way of doing things. That club employed an 'our' capiital notion, where only their capital was supposed to be allowed to realise an opportunity. The concept was a controlling reach into all the other nations. The BRIC forum needs to foster a anybodies capital, soverign national rights notion. Whereby nations feel confortable, in that they maintain national cohesiveness in terms of their economics, whilst at the same time having equal access to world capital opportunities and markets. G7 and WTO failed to achieve this because of their self interested empire G7 notions. Let's look forward to improvement, moving on from a continual historic debate, that banishes us to the past. We all know about the evil British empire, responsible for over 30 million Indian deaths, but this all gets us nowhere. we need take lessons from the past that the British empire committed widespread attrocities, across the globe, but that has little relevence to the economics of today, or indeed the modern British people. Good economics, will feed people, will put clothes on their back, will pay for their medicines, will pay for their pensions, will give them a sense of purpose.... History, misused, as a weapon, will just give continual suffering, take the lessons form history, not results, so as to try to replay a game, in a self defeating, circularly downward, destructive way, - move on to a true global economy amongst nations, not a global ecomonomy amongst the 'few' regardless of nations.
Bric {brick= a block of burnt clay}. We are taulking in terms of construction and that's good. Up to now we were taulking about destruction, devision,hygemonies, spheres of influence etc. Joy to the World an new king is born! We hope through this congregate of nations to see justice, freedom, and independence from US that has been bulying my country like all pimps do to their whores. {Established and maintained the dictatorshipeGreece {1967-1964}, gave half of Cyprus to illegalimmigrants from Turkey and similarly it was the helping hand in Kossovo and Palestine.Kissinger said that Greeks are expendebles and the Aegean see constitute the future US deposits}. First the name would be more melodious if it were BRIC GREEK, that is if it included the country where Orthodoxy was born, Greece the kredle of civilisation! This would be an ambition for many Greeks and a well founded strategic reason, because: 1.- US does not allow us to extend our territorial waters,in accordance to international low, from 6miles to 12 miles. That would mean that more then 80% of the Aegean see would be our territorial waters. But we don't have to extend them, becausethe3.000 isnslandsconstitut anArchpelagos and that means that the whole Aegean is Greek. Then the seeshores of Asia Minor are under occupation, so theydon't even have rights on their coastal waters. In order to estabilsh rights by force for Turkey US, "Israel", and Turkey play games -"exircises" flying over the inlands and even the mainland. NATO has gavehalff the control of the Aegean se to the Turks and installed a Turkish General in mittle Greece as the Commanding Officer of the Aegean see and last butnot least forcedto bring our terrestiral forces hundrets of Kilometers fromthefuture GreatAlbania, Bulgaria and Skopia {stoollen name "Makedonia"}, although Turkieyhas posted forces on our frontiers with all these countries. NATO can not intervene between member states, but intervened in favor of Turkey for invading and taking over the isneland of Cyprus for the protection of "Israel" against Syria. So why in the hell are we still in NATO. 2.- We don't want pimps, we want a contractor that can pump th oil for us: Russia. 3.- We need SS-400 that can aime...the old model SS-300 at 160 targets simultaniously and destroy 80 % of them. Now the "Patriot" missle has a succes ofer ..10%, but we have to buy them. We don't have money we will pay after we sell our oil. : Russia - Bric 4.- We need a reliable protection form a friend and not from a prostitute pimp. All our neighbors have schisofrenic claims over our territory and the Jews say that our city Thessaloniki is the"new Jerusalem" and "The mother of all jews"... and a refuge in case a nuclear attack is eminent against "Israel".
India and Latin America suffered for almost 400 years from the "Cooperation" with the British Empire, Amercia and so on... They have very very very bad experience with such colonial countries. THEY WILL NEVER be allies with US. Just Imposible!!! Up to the 16th-17th century India together with China had been the most developed countries in the World, until the British Empire totally destroyed India(in the 18-19th century) and made it one of the poorest places in the world. Britain tried to destroy CHINA as well (OPIUM Wars), bud didnt succeeded. Tragedy!!! TRAGEDY!!! This is probably the worst moment of development of the human civilization!!!
June 30, 2009, 16:16
Inform President Medvedev that I am very proud of the progress he has made. Also I am very proud of the BRIC alliances. This is the beginning of a positive powerful economical, and political force that will change, and enhance, and help the future of their countries and others around the globe. It is essential and very important that this alliance will last a very long time. Other countries of the world will look up to this positive, and helpful, and productive force. Remember, to improve the livelihood of the people, your country members, and dont be afraid to have others to join your alliance. But make sure that they are screened properly, and thouroughly, without any prejeduce, and never underestimate the the force of opposition that may try to hinder your progress!
June 22, 2009, 13:03
Let the west live with thier ignorant policies,this is the 21st century ,countries have educated themselves ,and surpassed western ideaology and its way of life.these countries China ,india ,brazil ,russia ,have a philosophy far superior to the west,it is time these devoloped countries which have ambitions of unity,instead of divisions amongst it own kind..Countries with a philosophy of materialism as it object of living ,eventually end up in chaos and instability.
June 21, 2009, 08:03
BRIC is what he meant as Johnx points out, however, spinfusor is right, he got Brazil and China out of order. Unless of course he is calculating China some other way. Which could be ominous! Unless there is some sea territory involved. I put it down to a geniune mistake, but hey he might start following the trend of doing stand up comedy as a world leader :-)
June 21, 2009, 00:53
@Spinfusor
Maybe he meant of the BRIC countries
June 20, 2009, 16:08
I'm a little confused when Medvedev says, "while Russia and Brazil are the biggest countries by territory." Brazil is behind PRC, USA, and Canada...
June 19, 2009, 17:51
This should be a foward looking organisation, to allow economic development across the board for all nations, to have a forum on equal terms, as an alternative to the G7 controllers way of doing things. That club employed an 'our' capiital notion, where only their capital was supposed to be allowed to realise an opportunity. The concept was a controlling reach into all the other nations. The BRIC forum needs to foster a anybodies capital, soverign national rights notion. Whereby nations feel confortable, in that they maintain national cohesiveness in terms of their economics, whilst at the same time having equal access to world capital opportunities and markets. G7 and WTO failed to achieve this because of their self interested empire G7 notions. Let's look forward to improvement, moving on from a continual historic debate, that banishes us to the past. We all know about the evil British empire, responsible for over 30 million Indian deaths, but this all gets us nowhere. we need take lessons from the past that the British empire committed widespread attrocities, across the globe, but that has little relevence to the economics of today, or indeed the modern British people. Good economics, will feed people, will put clothes on their back, will pay for their medicines, will pay for their pensions, will give them a sense of purpose.... History, misused, as a weapon, will just give continual suffering, take the lessons form history, not results, so as to try to replay a game, in a self defeating, circularly downward, destructive way, - move on to a true global economy amongst nations, not a global ecomonomy amongst the 'few' regardless of nations.
June 19, 2009, 17:21
Bric {brick= a block of burnt clay}. We are taulking in terms of construction and that's good. Up to now we were taulking about destruction, devision,hygemonies, spheres of influence etc. Joy to the World an new king is born! We hope through this congregate of nations to see justice, freedom, and independence from US that has been bulying my country like all pimps do to their whores. {Established and maintained the dictatorshipeGreece {1967-1964}, gave half of Cyprus to illegalimmigrants from Turkey and similarly it was the helping hand in Kossovo and Palestine.Kissinger said that Greeks are expendebles and the Aegean see constitute the future US deposits}.
First the name would be more melodious if it were BRIC GREEK, that is if it included the country where Orthodoxy was born, Greece the kredle of civilisation!
This would be an ambition for many Greeks and a well founded strategic reason, because:
1.- US does not allow us to extend our territorial waters,in accordance to international low, from 6miles to 12 miles. That would mean that more then 80% of the Aegean see would be our territorial waters. But we don't have to extend them, becausethe3.000 isnslandsconstitut anArchpelagos and that means that the whole Aegean is Greek. Then the seeshores of Asia Minor are under occupation, so theydon't even have rights on their coastal waters. In order to estabilsh rights by force for Turkey US, "Israel", and Turkey play games -"exircises" flying over the inlands and even the mainland. NATO has gavehalff the control of the Aegean se to the Turks and installed a Turkish General in mittle Greece as the Commanding Officer of the Aegean see and last butnot least forcedto bring our terrestiral forces hundrets of Kilometers fromthefuture GreatAlbania, Bulgaria and Skopia {stoollen name "Makedonia"}, although Turkieyhas posted forces on our frontiers with all these countries. NATO can not intervene between member states, but intervened in favor of Turkey for invading and taking over the isneland of Cyprus for the protection of "Israel" against Syria. So why in the hell are we still in NATO.
2.- We don't want pimps, we want a contractor that can pump th oil for us: Russia.
3.- We need SS-400 that can aime...the old model SS-300 at 160 targets simultaniously and destroy 80 % of them. Now the "Patriot" missle has a succes ofer ..10%, but we have to buy them. We don't have money we will pay after we sell our oil. : Russia - Bric
4.- We need a reliable protection form a friend and not from a prostitute pimp. All our neighbors have schisofrenic claims over our territory and the Jews say that our city Thessaloniki is the"new Jerusalem" and "The mother of all jews"... and a refuge in case a nuclear attack is eminent against "Israel".
June 19, 2009, 16:20
@ KAP
India and Latin America suffered for almost 400 years from the "Cooperation" with the British Empire, Amercia and so on... They have very very very bad experience with such colonial countries. THEY WILL NEVER be allies with US. Just Imposible!!!
Up to the 16th-17th century India together with China had been the most developed countries in the World, until the British Empire totally destroyed India(in the 18-19th century) and made it one of the poorest places in the world. Britain tried to destroy CHINA as well (OPIUM Wars), bud didnt succeeded. Tragedy!!! TRAGEDY!!! This is probably the worst moment of development of the human civilization!!!
June 19, 2009, 15:44
Too bad the USA did not make a serious attemt to have Brazil & India join one of our global alliances. We really droped the ball on that one.
Post comment